眾生無邊誓願度
煩惱無盡誓願斷
法門無量誓願學
佛道無上誓願成

Master Sheng-Ru Website Logo

Dharma Teachings

11 Mar 2020    Wednesday     2nd Teach Total 2202

Volume III of the Shurangama Sutra: The Eye Faculty as the Wondrous Tathāgatagarbha and True Suchness Nature

Ananda, why are the six entrances fundamentally the Tathagatagarbha's wondrous true suchness nature? Ananda, take the visual fatigue arising from the eye's fixed gaze. Both the eye and the fatigue are Bodhi. The phenomenon of visual fatigue arises from the two illusory dusts of light and darkness. The faculty of seeing, residing within, absorbs these dust phenomena, and this is called the seeing nature. This seeing, apart from those two dusts of light and darkness, ultimately has no substance.

Explanation: Furthermore, Ananda, why are the six entrances fundamentally the Tathagatagarbha's wondrous true suchness nature? Ananda, the activity, the fatigue, the functioning phenomena that appear when your eye gazes fixedly at objects – the eye is the eye faculty, the fatigue phenomenon is the aggregate of formations – both are the wondrous Bodhi manifesting and functioning as the phenomenon of contact-fatigue. The eye faculty, relying on the two illusory dust realms of light and darkness, contacts form-dust, and within this, the seeing nature of the eye arises. The seeing nature absorbs these dust realms, thereby manifesting the dust realms, and this is called the seeing nature. This seeing nature, separated from the two illusory dusts of light and darkness, fundamentally has no substance of seeing.

The Buddha, from the outset, explains how the six entrances are fundamentally the Tathagatagarbha's wondrous true suchness nature. The meaning is that the six entrances in their entirety are produced by the Tathagatagarbha; they are the functional attributes of the Tathagatagarbha. Therefore, within the six entrances, one can discover the functional role of the Tathagatagarbha and realize the Tathagatagarbha. The activity, the contact-fatigue phenomena of the eye faculty and the mental faculty, are the wondrous true suchness nature. The seeing nature that is produced is the wondrous true suchness nature. Moreover, the two conditions of light and darkness that produce the seeing nature are the wondrous true suchness nature. What sentient beings see, contact, and utilize is all the wondrous true suchness nature; there is not a single dharma that is not the wondrous true suchness nature. Realizing the Tathagatagarbha is actually not difficult; the Tathagatagarbha is everywhere, It does not hide. The key lies in the sentient beings' own karmic obstructions, whether the conditions for realizing the nature are fully mature, whether the bodhisattva nature is complete, whether precepts, concentration, and wisdom are fully developed. The difficulty lies precisely here.

原文:如是阿难。当知是见。非明暗来。非于根出。不于空生。何以故。若从明来。暗即随灭。应非见暗。若从暗来。明即随灭。应无见明。若从根生。必无明暗。如是见精。本无自性。若于空出。前瞩尘象。归当见根。又空自观。何关汝入。是故当知。眼入虚妄。本非因缘。非自然性。

Thus, Ananda, you should know that this seeing nature does not come from light or darkness, does not arise from the faculty, and does not arise from emptiness. Why? If it came from light, when darkness came, it should cease along with the light and be unable to see darkness. If it came from darkness, when light came, it should cease along with the darkness and be unable to see light. If it arose from the faculty, it would necessarily be independent of light and darkness; yet such seeing-essence fundamentally lacks self-nature. If it arose from emptiness, looking forward it perceives dust phenomena, but turning back, it should see the eye faculty itself, yet it does not. Furthermore, if emptiness itself could see, what would it have to do with your entrance? Therefore, you should know that the eye-entrance is illusory; it is fundamentally not born from causes and conditions, nor is it of spontaneous nature.

Explanation: Thus, Ananda, you should know that this seeing nature does not come from the phenomena of light and darkness, does not arise from the eye faculty, and does not arise from emptiness. Why is it said this way? If the seeing nature came from light, when darkness arrived, the seeing nature should disappear along with the light; then it could not see darkness or know darkness. If the seeing nature came from darkness, when light appeared, the seeing nature should disappear; then it could not see light. If the seeing nature arose from the eye faculty, it would necessarily be independent of the phenomena of light and darkness; such seeing-essence fundamentally has no intrinsic nature of its own. If the seeing nature arose from emptiness, looking forward it perceives dust images, but turning back, it should be able to see the eye faculty itself, yet it does not see the eye faculty. Moreover, if emptiness itself could see, what connection would it have to your eye faculty? Therefore, you should know that the eye-entrance is illusory; it is fundamentally not born from causes and conditions, nor is it of spontaneous nature, but is the nature of the Tathagatagarbha.

——Master Sheng-Ru's Teachings
PreviousPrevious

"Selections from the Sutra on the Discernment of Karmic Retribution of Good and Evil"

Next Next

Volume Three of the Śūraṅgama Sūtra: The Auditory Faculty as the Marvelous True Suchness Nature of Tathāgatagarbha

Back to Top