Discovering Truth and Facts Through Single-Pointed Concentration

Many psychologists and other social scientists do not believe in or study Buddhism, yet they can clearly distinguish between consciousness and the subconscious. We who study Buddhist Yogācāra, however, fail to differentiate between the two—truly a cause for shame and regret. If the observational, contemplative wisdom of Yogācāra scholars, experts, and specialists cannot even surpass that of a psychologist lacking the wisdom of meditative concentration (dhyāna) and Yogācāra insight (prajñā), then how can they be considered true Yogācāra experts, scholars, or specialists? It remains unclear why such a situation has arisen.

A: My understanding is this: Some scholars, artists, and researchers often become deeply absorbed in their studies, pondering constantly until they unwittingly attain a state of strong concentration (samādhi). This allows them to observe subtle phenomena.

B: Exactly. They possess meditative concentration, but it is not deliberately cultivated; rather, it arises from immense interest and passion. They are not confined by religious dogmas nor obsessed with religious notions of right and wrong. I have observed that many religious adherents, by contrast, confine themselves, living in a world of conceptual thinking. These scholars, however, approach their research and exploration with enthusiasm and a sense of responsibility. Thus, they can focus single-mindedly, showing little interest in other matters, and thereby uncover truth and facts.