Some say: since the manas is also a consciousness, it should be able to perceive external objects; so why is it that when a person is unconscious, there is not the slightest perception of external objects? The answer to this question is as follows: the lack of perception during unconsciousness is that the mind consciousness no longer perceives, while the manas still perceives. When the manas perceives, once the mind consciousness ceases, it cannot know the manas's perception. Even if the mind consciousness does not cease, if it lacks the wisdom to cognize, it still cannot know the manas's perceptive function. This is because the manas's knowing must be made known to the mind consciousness before sentient beings can know it; sentient beings take the knowing of the mind consciousness as their knowing, and whatever the mind consciousness does not know, they regard as unknown.
However, the mind consciousness not knowing does not mean the manas does not know either. Therefore, when one is sleeping dreamlessly or is unconscious—when the mind consciousness has vanished—the manas's knowing cannot be transmitted to the mind consciousness, so the mind consciousness does not know; and when the mind consciousness does not know, sentient beings do not know. Even when the mind consciousness is functioning normally and has not vanished, if it lacks wisdom, it still does not know the manas's knowing. When the mind consciousness lacks wisdom, it also does not know what kind of mental activity the manas is engaged in or what the manas has perceived. Therefore, whether the manas possesses the introspection of self-validating cognition (sva-saṃvitti-saṃvitti-bhāga) cannot be observed by the mind consciousness, and whether the manas knows of its own existence also cannot be observed by the mind consciousness. So when the mind consciousness cannot observe it, one should not make judgments about how the manas is or is not.
4
+1